login about faq

Due to the large amount of spam accounts, we temporarily disabled new user sign ups. To override this, email newuser.lgqa@gmail.com and an admin will determine if you are permitted to join


Onlive is a streaming service. Completely awesome. You should check it out. The coolest thing is is that you can stream games through your connection :D. This is mainly for Chris Pirillo to check out.

asked Nov 29 '10 at 15:23

Vancar6's gravatar image

Vancar6
1.4k150160173


I don't like it much. I don't mind not owning a physical copy of a game, like what you get through Steam, but not owning anything, isn't for me.

  • What if I don't pay for my subscription, can I still play the games I payed for?

  • What if the company goes out of business, have I wasted hundreds of dollars on games I will never be able to play again?

  • It would drive me insane if I bought a game and wasn't able to even play single player, because the servers are down.

  • How well is it going to preform while playing online, which would require even more bandwidth.

The only really big positive I can see, is that there wouldn't be any hackers. But even that is fun sometimes.

answered Nov 29 '10 at 17:22

Justin's gravatar image

Justin
8.4k104143222

edited Nov 29 '10 at 17:22

That is even a problem with some games that you can still buy physical copies of. I bought Command And Conquer 4: Tiberium Twilight and you have to be on the internet to play the game even single player. I feel bad for the people that bought the game but can't play it because they don't have internet. I have played it and sometimes their servers are down so I can't play.

(Nov 29 '10 at 17:25) TheTechDude TheTechDude's gravatar image

That's why I am going to stick with my consoles, and Steam for a while. ;)

(Nov 29 '10 at 17:30) Justin Justin's gravatar image

Ya, I wish I had known about the problem before I bought the game. I might not have bought it. (Probably still would have since I love the C&C series that much)

(Nov 29 '10 at 17:34) TheTechDude TheTechDude's gravatar image

It is purely based on a gimmick.

It sounds great to be able to use any low powered system and run any game regardless of how demanding it is. Sounds great on paper but in reality it is like this.

Not all games will be at their max visual quality. You are limited in which resolution you can use since the content is streamed, the video stream is compressed (max 720p resolution)

You wont get the full audio experience of the game

Lag is not fun, imagine this, you are connected to the server at a ping of 100ms, the server takes 100ms to send you the visual info of a enemy shooting at you, you act upon that info and your actions take 100ms to reach the server. You just got a 200ms delay on a game designed with the expectation of a 0 ping delay.

Now lets repeat this for a multiplayer game.

Suppose you want to do multiplayer, between you and the online server, there is a 200ms delay, now between the onlive server and the game server, suppose there is a 100-200ms delay, you just got your self a unplayable ping because no matter how good you are, you will be stuck with nearly a half second delay.

it is also a very bandwidth intensive service, if you are on a service like comcast, you may only have enough bandwidth to complete probably 1 single player game and if you are lucky, a little bit of multiplayer before hitting your bandwidth cap

Also 1 problem with most ISP's is that during peak usage hours, your bandwidth and ping are impacted, you may not be able to play your games during peak times. Peak times are peak times for a reason, it is a time when most people have free time and probably the time your friends are online.

Now suppose your internet is down, you cant even play a game to pass by the time.

Now suppose the company decided to close up shop or increase their monthly fee to a rate that you are no longer willing to pay, guess what, you cant play any of your games.

Then as pointed out before, when the company goes out of business, they are taking your games with them.

Another problem, onlive cost $5 a month for access to their service, on top of that you pay additional fees for each game you actually want to play. here is an article that better explains it,

http://www.pcworld.com/article/191433/onlives_pricing_wont_add_up_for_most_gamers.html

Onlive is significantly more expensive than getting the gaming hardware and buying your games while at the same time offering less control over the games (no modding or anything) and offering less features

With onlive, you are still buying the games, $5 a month allows you to do the remote processing of the games, then just like steam, you buy the games you actually want play. for the price of a few months of onlive, you can upgrade your PC to be gaming ready.

http://www.geek.com/articles/games/onlive-pricing-announced-and-its-expensive-20100621/

all in all, you are better off upgrading your PC and buying your games from steam.

PS with onlive after a year, you introductory price disappears and you are now paying $15 a month for access to the service, + the cost of buying the games.

also here is what onlive has to say about when you buy a game from them
Provides unlimited access to the selected game throughout its supported lifetime on the OnLive service

their fine print rates a supported life for 3 years, meaning you better not want to play that game after 3 years because you wont be able to.

answered Nov 29 '10 at 20:37

Razor512's gravatar image

Razor512
15.6k3480242

edited Nov 29 '10 at 20:59

You may be correct about some things but the reason I keep using it is because IT'S FREE. I don't think younhave your facts up to date because OnLive took away the monthly and yearly fees because they are making enough money to not charge monthly. I usually buy 3 day playpasses on try weekend so I can play games. I rarely have lag issues on a wired connection

(Nov 29 '10 at 22:52) TomMaxwell TomMaxwell's gravatar image

I think this kind of thing will just get better and better. Although i do see your points.

(Nov 30 '10 at 20:12) Vancar6 Vancar6's gravatar image

gaming in the cloud!, there servers do the work

answered Nov 29 '10 at 15:25

ZachSeale's gravatar image

ZachSeale
111124

Yep! I hope chris pirillo checks it out :D

(Nov 29 '10 at 15:26) Vancar6 Vancar6's gravatar image

I've been using OnLive since the very limited beta and I love it! I have 20mbps down on average and it runs perfectly for me! Just recently OnLive sent me the MicroConsole for free because I was part of the beta. It's pretty good

answered Nov 29 '10 at 17:39

TomMaxwell's gravatar image

TomMaxwell
1.6k94104122

Youtube Link


Just a little tour i recently did for those of you who are curios.

answered Nov 30 '10 at 20:09

Vancar6's gravatar image

Vancar6
1.4k150160173

edited Nov 30 '10 at 20:11

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or __italic__
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported


Join Us in the Chat Room

Tags:

×133
×54
×8

Asked: Nov 29 '10 at 15:23

Seen: 1,178 times

Last updated: Nov 30 '10 at 20:12