login about faq

Today Gizmodo (http://gizmodo.com) released a redesign for their website. It looks ugly and is not pleasing to the eyes.

What do you think about the new theme?

asked Feb 08 '11 at 00:24

Craighton's gravatar image

Craighton
16.5k112206328


12next page »

All I have to say is I'm glad RSS exists. Now I never have to view this horrible design again.

answered Feb 08 '11 at 06:55

JosephD's gravatar image

JosephD
1917915

That is horrible. I'm telling you - someone needs to be fired. I cannot believe they paid for that.

answered Feb 08 '11 at 00:27

Kat's gravatar image

Kat ♦♦
5.0k145484

Wow, it's abysmal.

Pages take too long to load, if i click a link on the right then push the down arrow to scroll down it - oh how intuitive it goes to the NEXT ARTICLE! Wait, I wasn't finished reading the first one!

And what's with the huge gizmodo splash screen on half the articles on the front page? Lots of waste on the margins - it should size according to my browser space.

I think I'll aggregate the articles from their site so I can read them in text-only format.

edit: OMG it gets better! I have a wacky screen size because of this pseudo-netbook, and it seems that the right navigation bar on their page is entirely cut off at the bottom. But wait, it gets better! They've attached the scroll bar to the middle region ALONE so it's apparently not possible to scroll the right region!

Seriously! They broke the site! It not only looks bad, it doesn't work on all monitors!

answered Feb 08 '11 at 02:24

Duodave's gravatar image

Duodave
4.4k374393

edited Feb 08 '11 at 02:28

I usually just "Deal with it" when sites change their layouts, but I honestly can't use Gizmodo anymore. I'm stuck with Engadget, and all the immature commenters. >,>

answered Feb 08 '11 at 17:32

Justin's gravatar image

Justin
8.3k104142221

Personally, I hate it. It looks horrible and I hate it. I give them less than a month before they switch back.

answered Feb 08 '11 at 00:28

Craighton's gravatar image

Craighton
16.5k112206328

It's too confusing. It looks innovative, I'll give them that, but it's just a little too much.

answered Feb 08 '11 at 00:34

Anthony%20Guidetti's gravatar image

Anthony Guidetti
1.6k7685113

Same thing at Lifehacker (since they are all run by the same folks) and it's horrible. Not user friendly at all.

answered Feb 08 '11 at 02:17

Sozo's gravatar image

Sozo
3.9k203568

You know, when @donttrythis (Adam Savage) has a problem with the design and tweets about it, you know theirs a problem.

"@donttrythis - Oh my goodness. Hey Gawker? Everything you're doing today doesn't work for me."

"@donttrythis - Ack! They did it to Gizmodo too!"

It loads extremely slow and uses a lot of cpu in all browsers, especially chrome.

One less tech blog to visit :(

answered Feb 08 '11 at 02:48

zoomos's gravatar image

zoomos
462

This used to be a favorite site of mine... The new design is terrible...

answered Feb 08 '11 at 17:26

BigHead%20Bear's gravatar image

BigHead Bear
1

For a "tech blog" - it 100% sucks balls!! Rule No.1 for ANY blog = Make it EASY to comprehend. Emphasis on EASY!!

I can't believe anyone prefers that crap to the previous design - you know, the one that actually made visiting the site a pleasure? Why break, I mean "fix" something when it's not broken?

answered Feb 09 '11 at 15:43

dparks2010's gravatar image

dparks2010
1

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or __italic__
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Become a Gnomie!


Join Us in the Chat Room

Tags:

×312
×145
×61
×16

Asked: Feb 08 '11 at 00:24

Seen: 5,931 times

Last updated: Feb 17 '11 at 17:36