|
I just watched a video on YouTube of Chris Pirillo's speech at LeWeb in Paris in 2009. Of all the videos of Chris I have seen, I had never seen this one before today, and he really hit home with some key points, especially going into the various aspects of what we consider a "community". At one point, he mentions certain community "tools" include things like Facebook, Twitter, and similar sites, that obviously, bring people closer together and makes people aware of "what's going on". I have never understood why so many people tend to be on multiple social networking sites all at the same time. I'm on Facebook, and a few tech communities (this one included, obviously) and that's it for me. Yet I have one friend for example that is on Facebook, MySpace (I still forgive him), Twitter, Blogster, hi5, etc., yet he's just your "average Joe". Someone like Chris I can see being a part of so many networking groups and communities, as he's not only a "tech icon" I guess you could say, but he's also in the business/entrepreneurial aspect as well. Someone like him and others alike I could see being a part of all those, but your "average Joe"? Generally I would think that if I joined up for MySpace again after all this time, and joined Twitter, the only people that will follow me, are typically the same people I'm friends with on Facebook; that said, I guess my question is, does the average person benefit from being a part of all of those too, or does it matter? Maybe this sounds like a dumb question, maybe I haven't worded quite like I wanted to, but I'm hoping someone in the community will understand the context of the question. (sorry for the long-windedness…) |
|
I'm on multiple social networks youtube-videos, myspace-music, facebook-friends, twitter-anyone-keep tactor others etc,.. |
