|
This question has been bouncing around my mind for ages, and I finally thought it was time to say it. I think that Windows 7 is too user friendly, the look of it makes me seem that Microsoft dumbed it down for the end user. I use both Windows Vista and Windows 7, and I think they're both great, but Windows Vista's look and feel seems right for me. Plus Vista can do all of the things 7 can do since they are both supported by major hardware/software. What do you think?
|
|
Basically by your philosophy you are saying that Vista is better than 7? LOL WUT!?!?!? o.O Had to get the troll out of me really quickly. Anyways, you can customize Windows 7 to look like Vista if you so please. Like Chris said, 7 is a service pack for Vista, and a good one!!! Link me that video please? Gracias! Here is Chris' rant against Vista. And how would you want 7 to look like Vista? In what way? You can change the taskbar to look like Vista. You can have a System Monitor on your Desktop as well. I don't really want my Vista to look like 7, in fact, thats what I love about Vista! It's a mix between XP and 7. i meant in what way would you want 7 to resemble Vista? To make it look completely like vista.
showing 5 of 6
show all
|
|
I'm not sure there's such a thing as "too user-friendly", but maybe something can be user-friendly in the wrong ways. I don't use Windows 7 much but when I do I get the feeling that they took the old Windows and tried really hard to throw in some new user-friendly features. I don't get that feeling as much with Mac OS X Lion. The features added in Lion are ones that really changed and improved my workflow (e.g. Mission Control, fullscreen apps, more touch gestures, etc.). I just feel like Windows 7 is kind of the same old Windows with some convenient UI add-ons. They're nice, but they don't really change the way I operate in most cases. I do love the window snapping feature though. I use BetterTouchTool on my Mac that enables that feature. But that's just my 2 cents, I could be wrong. Again, I don't use Windows 7 on a daily basis. |
|
yes it is. and for one good reason: Marketing a.k.a more consumers and to target those consumers who never knew technical know-hows with computers. would that technique earn them money? - Billions of 'em. The taskbar, for me, looks like Microsoft is taking a page from Apple's dock. 1
it's never a patented idea and will only remain to be an "Opinion" unless there is legal proof of microsoft being a "copy-cat" the OS isn't all the asset of MS. it's also their number of clients and marketing strategy. Like your Bath soap. its fragrance, effectivity etc. isn't all that's in concern, it's also the advertising, popularity, etc etc that makes it a product that's famous to all. Waiiiiit, did you just say that Windows isn't an asset to Microsoft? Then what is keeping MS afloat? Windows Phone? @DJ scooby Doo I agree, it's like someone saying iPhone is not an asset to apple you got me wrong dude. the OS is an asset, it's their main "Menu" (analogy of a restaurant) but what makes that "restaurant" popular isn't just the food they offer. There are a lot of other factors such as advertising, etc. that being said, Microsoft is a Giant in the business because they were "first" to popularize the product and people are used-to using them. Ok, I agree with you there, but still, Microsoft just started advertising with Windows 7, and Apple has been advertising for years. What makes Microsoft famous is the bread and butter, Microsoft Windows.
showing 5 of 6
show all
|
|
All windows versions are as easy to use as each other in my opinion, maybe Windows XP/2000 was easier than Vista/7. |
|
They are similar enough for me to look past the small differences. However, is Windows 8 too user friendly would be a much greater question. |
|
No it's not. I work with people on a daily basis that still don't know how to maximize a screen! I agree with you on customizing so maybe that's where the other versions of 7 come in, Pro, Ultimate? Since Windows is a consumer OS maybe your needs will be best met by an OS designed by the community for the community. Ubuntu :) Well yeah, I like Windows sure, not going to fully switch to a different OS just because of one OS, I will try Ubuntu again, but for right now all of my programs (I think) are Windows only. 1
I can't let this one go. I'm sorry but I have to disagree with your reference to Ubuntu as a distro for the community by the community. That is what Ubuntu used to be, like 2+ years ago, but it is no longer. Ubuntu is Canonical giving its users an OS that they may like, but to hell with those that do not want a paradigm change! I'll admit that this is a bit of a personal rant but if you really want an OS is that is user-friendly and developed by people that listen to its community, to give a product that they actually want, go to Linux Mint. They have developed their own DE (Cinnamon), as their users were not satisfied with either Gnome 3 or Unity. And that is no small achievement. Yes Cinnamon is only a shell but Mint is much smaller than Canonical and have created something that is so much better for the desktop than Unity (also a shell) will ever be. sorry /rant Cool. I'll check it out today. Good looking out @AlanStryder. |



Yes, both of these screenshots are mine :)
You have a terribly ordinary Windows 7 desktop even after the fact that you are a geek.
I should've included this, I only use this Windows 7 partition for one thing, and that is to go to TinyChat and broadcast music. I have used Windows 7 as my main system, but always for some reason go back to Vista.
it appears true seeing the app installed in windows 7 compare to vista., you see my friend it's all about familiarity and "home" environment. some people cannot live in a vista system (like me and my other mates) and some can only live in windows XP. worse of all some can only live in Windows / Mac machines.
it doesn't matter really, because like what I am telling you What is good for one person is not the concern of Microsoft, they won't earn from that. but what concerns most of their client will always be their priority. it's business after all.
so even if a much better technology platform whatever exist, they won't use it, not until Most people will buy it (at least according to what they think)