|
I have been on Google+ on a while, but only a handful of my friends are on Google+. Am I the only one? They seem to be attached to Facebook and/or Twitter instead. Although Google has tried to get more attention recently, it is not as active as Facebook or Twitter is. What do you think? |
|
I think this is just like Google Wave. Everyone's excited about it, but no one's switching over. Except Google+ is a little better integrated than Wave was. |
|
I think it is I can find most of my friends on there.. only time will tell |
|
Facebook took years to take off. Part of that was the fact they made it exclusive to draw people into the site. People want what they can't have, once they have it they either are like meh, or they get addicted to it before the enthusiasm wears off. |
|
Here's what I think about social networks: It's hard to get people to switch to your social network, but it's even harder to get them to stay. Why is this? People go to where their friends are. I'm on Google+, but only one or two of my friends are, so I'm not a Google+ regular. This is the perfect example of "It's even harder to get people to stay." |
|
I believe there is a fundamental misunderstanding about what Google+ is for, and I'm not sure if it's Google's fault, or whether it's the media or whether it's just an amalgamation of those plus a general lack of insight within the population of social media users. Frankly, Google+ isn't Facebook. It's not Twitter, either. Google+ is its own network. A lot has been written by very smart folks about the social graph versus the interest graph, and if you want to round out your understanding, I highly recommend doing some research on those buzzwords and what they really mean. Speaking as someone who uses Google+ extensively, I can tell you the following things:
|
