|
I currently have my eyes set on the Intel I3-3220 CPU and it has Intel HD Graphics 2500. I have also been looking at this GPU to go with it: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814500276. It is a very affordable and low-end GPU but I would like good gaming performance. The question is, is this GPU better than the Intel HD Graphics 2500 or am I just wasting $30? |
|
Just face it, the only games that you'll be playing with those graphics are Minesweeper... What I want to do is build a new desktop. I went on Newegg and chose all the parts according to my preference and budget. This is what I chose: Case: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811146069 Motherboard: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128540 CPU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116775 GPU: Listed above. PSU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817371045 Is 450Watts enough power? Media Player and HDD: Irrelevant. I will also get a Windows 8 CD. I forgot to mention, the Motherboard also includes 2x4GB RAM. First off, I know that this must have been a hard decision to decide what parts that you wanted. I don't want to undermine the effort that you must have put in to make sure that everything works together nicely. With that said, I would like to make a suggestion. If you choose AMD, you'll get a little more bang for your buck. So an APU is just a CPU with integrated graphics? Or is it a CPU with "better" integrated graphics compared to others? I wanted to go with Intel because they are a little bit more premium. Also, do all cases come with fans? (For the case, not CPU) I'm sorry if I confused you. An APU is what AMD calls their CPUs with integrated graphics. The reason that they name it that, is because it sounds better. Personally, I think that it represents it a whole lot better, because integrated graphics from Intel are currently horrible. Oh okay. I understand now. Regardless, it does not matter if the integrated graphics are good or bad because, going back to the original question, I was going to buy a GPU. I'm going to restate my original question to make it more straight forward: Which is faster, Intel HD Graphics 2500 or that $30 GPU that I chose? I would have to say that the GT 610 would be faster, not because of the GPU, but because of the gigabyte of dedicated video memory. Okay. Thanks for all the help! It still wouldn't be very fast though The Nvidia GT 610 would be about half of the performance of the AMD 5800K, and not too much faster than the Intel HD 2500 graphics. One last thing. Once I finish buildng the desktop, what happens when I press the power button on the case the very first time? What will come up on the screen? Will it ask me to insert windows CD and install?
showing 5 of 11
show all
|
|
You could play older games and maybe a couple of the newer ones with a gig or two of ram allocated. You would be much better off with discrete graphics. Some games won't even work with integrated graphics. You can use an AMD card on an Intel board. |
|
For gaming you will want a dedicated graphics card, for the best performance. But most computers ship with either HD graphics 3000 or 4000. So, I couldn't recommend that for gaming. |
|
Yea it is best to buy a separate card. I use a HD 6870 with a biostar g41d3c and it runs everything i have thrown at it. |
