login about faq


Over the past few years, the rate at which films are being made that are based on books has increased at an alarming rate. Although many of these film franchises have seen great success, such as the Twilight and Harry Potter films, I believe that most books are far better than the films based on them. An example of this is The Bourne Identity, Supremacy, and Ultimatum. Although these films are great as standalone films, they are mediocre in my opinion compared to the books which they are based on. This is because I think that the idea to modernize such books in an effort to make a ground breaking film makes the plot lose it's charm, and the story is much harder to tell if the plot is rewritten to the point where it vaguely resembles the original plot.

So, with this in mind, what are your thoughts on a particular film or film franchise based on a book, and do you think that the trend of basing films on books should be continued or scrapped?

asked Jun 28 '10 at 18:58

Maeurd's gravatar image

Maeurd
1.6k334264

edited Jul 04 '10 at 18:55


One in recent memory that kills me... the book for "My Sister's Keeper" is phenomenal. The movie... ticked me off big time. Yes, it's a "good" movie. However, the ending is COMPLETELY different. They changed it 100%, and it's just plain wrong. So what if the ending of the book is sad? The whole story is sad! There were some key components of the storyline that were left out of the movie, as well.

I know that parts of a story usually need to be left out when making a movie, so that it's the right "length." However, to completely change the ending that way... UGH!

answered Jun 28 '10 at 22:14

Kat's gravatar image

Kat ♦♦
5.0k145585

I love the Harry Potter series. Both the movies and the books. I haven't read the last book because I want to see the movie first. Who doesn't like them?

I loved the Sherlock Holmes movie also, but everything was mixed up - it wasn't based on one story also. I got the full collection of Sherlock Holmes and I love it (the book).

answered Jun 29 '10 at 11:39

Mihkel's gravatar image

Mihkel
4.6k4158114

2

I think that the directors and actors of the Harry Potter films did an incredible job in terms of making the Harry Potter world come to life, but the only thing that spoilt the experience of watching the Harry Potter films was that, after reading the books, I could notice that huge chucks of the plot-line had been removed from the film in order to keep the film at a reasonable length. I think that "legacy" editions of these films should be released, that feature the WHOLE or most of the plot of the books.

(Jun 29 '10 at 11:48) Maeurd Maeurd's gravatar image

Why do people keep watching the films first, if you read the book first you will have a better understanding and will remember the film better.

(Jul 04 '10 at 12:16) Feras Feras's gravatar image

Exactly, although reading the book can often make the experience of watching the film adaptation less enjoyable, as was the case for many when watching the film adaptation of Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code".

(Jul 08 '10 at 20:50) Maeurd Maeurd's gravatar image

I loved Runaway Jury, which is based on a book. Some of the plot elements changed; it was a gun trial in the movie, a tobacco trial in the book for example. I thought it was done very well.

answered Jun 28 '10 at 19:55

mrningrunner's gravatar image

mrningrunner
241116

I never read them, however I am tired of all this Twilight vampire nonsense thats running around now a days. I have a feeling even if I tried, I probably couldn't force myself to sit through one of those books.

I will say this. Interview with the Vampire was pretty darn good (the book and the movie). However Queen of the Damned was just plain stupid.

IMHO.

:)

answered Jun 28 '10 at 20:12

cMotz's gravatar image

cMotz
331138

I am an adult... and I LOVED the books. The movies... sucked. They were only loosely based on the actual books. Stephanie Meyer is a fantastic writer, and the stories were great in print. The movies were nothing more than a way to cash in on a craze. :(

(Jun 28 '10 at 22:13) Kat ♦♦ Kat's gravatar image

As a comic book fan of the Fantastic Four, the movies were/are an injustice. Too much was lost in the transition to the big screen. It feels that creators didn't even read the comic books. The X-MEN movies were abortions as well. Movie Makers need to understand the meaning of SUPERHERO.

I frequently read comic books, when I'm asked to entertain my nieces, nephews, and other youngsters. I find myself defending/explaining that SUPERHEROS are not GAY, Drama Queens in the closet. Wow?! Where do these youngsters get their information? Possibly from Soy Milk.

It will be interesting how Hollywood explains why/how the Green Lantern started out as a white guy, turned into a black guy, then back to a white guy in the upcoming movies.

alt text alt text alt text

answered Jun 29 '10 at 11:34

r0bErT4u's gravatar image

r0bErT4u
31.0k513672938

1

In some ways I agree that it's a shame that these types of films continue to be made, as I think the money spent making these films would be better spent funding new and upcoming comic artists / companies, but in some cases I think it's incredibly hard to create films that are better than or as good as the classic comics, regardless of the amount of money that is spent on such films.

(Jun 29 '10 at 11:46) Maeurd Maeurd's gravatar image

When I read a book or book series, I have a vision how people look and talk. When I see the movie, I'm sometimes disapointed.

LOTR is a classic example. Aragorn in my mind is someone who at first "looks foul but feels fair." Not the same way in the movie. Also they messed with some of the crucial scenes, and dropped "The Scouring of the Shire."

If Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time is ever made into movies, they will just not match what I expect.

answered Jun 29 '10 at 22:27

paoconnell99's gravatar image

paoconnell99
911

I thought it was a shame that with the LOTR movies they actually missed out crucial scenes, yet kept in scenes that were not as crucial to the overall plot of the series. The LOTR movies should've been made longer, and although many would disagree with this, if they believe that the LOTR movies are too long, they obviously haven't read the books.

(Jul 04 '10 at 11:33) Maeurd Maeurd's gravatar image

The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy book was way better than the movie, even though the movie was quite good. The got Marvin totally wrong.

answered Jun 29 '10 at 22:32

TheFogul's gravatar image

TheFogul
31181520

I thought the movie was good as a standalone movie, for those who haven't read the book, but compared to the book, the movie of the Hitchhikers Guide was a less-than-perfect adaptation.

(Jul 04 '10 at 11:30) Maeurd Maeurd's gravatar image

I wish they made the film into the original "trilogy in six parts" not just one movie.

(Jul 04 '10 at 12:14) Feras Feras's gravatar image

I also thought that the film adaptation of the The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy felt far too condensed, and it left many viewers confused at certain parts, as there was much less explanation compared to the book.

(Jul 08 '10 at 20:47) Maeurd Maeurd's gravatar image

Eragon was a great book..the movie wasn't all that bad but they took out so much and screwed up the story a bit...the book was slot better. I don't think they should have made into a movie

answered Jun 28 '10 at 20:23

SJP's gravatar image

SJP
4.6k84109168

Eragon was a great book..the movie wasn't all that bad but they took out so much and screwed up the story a bit...the book was slot better. I don't think they should have made into a movie

answered Jun 28 '10 at 20:23

SJP's gravatar image

SJP
4.6k84109168

I agree... and it often encourages people NOT to read the book that a certain film is based on if the film is terrible, even if the book that it is based on is significantly better than the film.

(Jun 29 '10 at 10:28) Maeurd Maeurd's gravatar image
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or __italic__
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported


Join Us in the Chat Room

Tags:

×179
×151
×119
×74
×57
×28
×21
×11
×10
×10
×7
×3
×2
×1
×1

Asked: Jun 28 '10 at 18:58

Seen: 1,849 times

Last updated: Jul 08 '10 at 20:50