login about faq

We've seen controller-based interaction, motion based interaction, and even virtual reality and augmented reality video games. But in order for the video gaming industry to prosper even more than it currently is, new technologies are developed to meet the needs of gamers who want a refreshing new way to interact with their games. This is often achieved by introducing new peripherals, or using existing technology, combined with newer technology, to provide an innovative new take on how we interact with our video games.

So my question to you all, gamers or non-gamers: What new form of interaction with video games would you like to see, or what existing form of interaction with video games do you want to grow in popularity?

asked Jul 03 '10 at 12:02

Maeurd's gravatar image

Maeurd
1.6k334264

edited Sep 29 '10 at 17:45


As I've been a PC gamer for a long time (unfortunately haven't had the time lately) I'm used with a keyboard and a mouse. Right now it would be too soon, but in the future I'd like to see some technology where you could be in the game and do all the moves yourself. For instance if your playing an FPS where you would like virtually run jump and shoot, but it feels like your doing it all in real life. That would be very cool - I'd love to see that.

answered Jul 04 '10 at 06:04

Mihkel's gravatar image

Mihkel
4.6k3656114

Thanks to innovations such as a touch table, augmented reality and the new Kinect, I've always felt it's time to re-imagine how gaming works.

With the Kinect alone you could re-imagine a game like Dungeons and Dragons. With what they showed with Milo the games can recognize your voice, your face, and the words you use. As such, we should be able to create a virtual DM on the Kinect to let you play Dungeons and Dragons. You would use all of the same things from real life, but the game would show you what was actually happening. You would also be able to use XBL to download new campaigns, quests, and software updates for the D&D system.

The touch table could be used in this way, as well, by offering a surface for your character sheets, dice rolling, and many other things that would need real world counterparts. Obviously the dice would still need to be real, but the table could read the result of the roll quickly and automatically take action. The dungeon map would be more interactive and built into the table, along with most of the system.

Augmented Reality (a head set that can display extras into reality) would add a whole new realm of playability to various games. FPS games in real life would be an obvious benefit. RPG games would work out fairly well, too. I can see augmented reality being used to create games in a new way very soon, if we can ever get passed the physical controller and screen. After all, what use is a screen that can display 3D and fake the game being in your reality if you actually can project the game into your reality? When the Playstation Eye showed the animal in your living room that you could pet and control, you still had to look at the screen. With augmented reality, you could see that animal and interact with it without needing to look at the screen. It would follow you wherever you go, avoid other people walking by, get trapped by doors, everything a real pet would have trouble with or enjoy. The only downside is the inability to feel the augmented parts of reality, which we aren't very far from remedying. If people want to get gamers moving, though, I think this would be the way to do it.

So, if I had to pick just one of these, I'd have to go with the Augmented Reality. Above all others, this one would be the coolest and has the most potential. Second in line would be Kinect. Both of these would be great if they would just finally do them right.

As for tech that we don't have yet, Holograms aren't nearly as far along as they should be. Once we can project them into a room, visible from all angles, and preferably interact with or touch them, then Holograms will be the absolute best thing for gaming ever.

answered Jul 04 '10 at 16:34

Eric%20Fox's gravatar image

Eric Fox
5112412

edited Aug 02 '10 at 12:02

Maeurd's gravatar image

Maeurd
1.6k334264

Augmented Reality doesn't just have to be in the form of a headset that overlays gameplay elements, as fairly high quality Augmented Reality software is already available for the iPhone 3G S and iPhone 4, as well as various smartphones capable of running the Android operating system. Some examples of Augmented Reality software are:- Layar - which is available for both iOS and Android, and Nearby Navi (as far as I know, this software is only available on Apple's App Store). I've seen very few examples of Augmented Reality software that are of the standard of some of the navigation software for either Android or iOS that use Augmented Reality.

(Aug 02 '10 at 12:09) Maeurd Maeurd's gravatar image

OMG The D&D thought you entertained there is the coolest idea ever! Aside from D&D I actually play the board game Risk quite a bit. Playing that on a touch table over the Internet is the GREATEST IDEA EVER! Yes I am aware of (and have played) several web sites and commercial Risk video games online, but it's just never the same as the actual game.

I think you are really on to something there!

(Sep 29 '10 at 23:32) AlanStryder AlanStryder's gravatar image

@ Maeurd

I know you can get augmented reality in other ways, but it will never feel real unless you can see it right in front of your eyes, as you are looking around the world.

@ AlanStryder

Yeah, I've had the D&D idea and a few of those other ones for some time, telling as many people as I can, even those involved with the actual games. And I honestly don't care about the rights or royalties or anything, I just want the game out there so I can play it. ^_^

(Sep 30 '10 at 11:51) Eric Fox Eric%20Fox's gravatar image

I think the controllers for the Xbox360 and PS3 are pretty decent as they are.

This move into motion technology is a step in the wrong direction, in my opinion. Instead of making the controlling of the games' aspects easier they have made them much much slower and require a lot more effort. Ask almost any PC gamer out there and they'll tell you that the response time between the pressing of a button or clicking of a mouse and the desired result makes the world of difference. We should be trying to make it so you practically think something and you see it happen on screen simultaneously.

Another thing which the Xbox360 in particular is definately moving away from is feedback. When Sony released their Sixaxis they soon brought out the DualShock3 to provide it with the feedback it was lacking. I just don't see how Kinect can work without having some other form of feedback than what you see on screen. Then again I have a similar problem with devices that only use touchscreen, but I won't get into that now.

answered Jul 04 '10 at 04:52

jw0nn0's gravatar image

jw0nn0
43181321

With a mouse and a keyboard. It's the way games are meant to be played!

answered Jul 04 '10 at 04:53

BenGrantFTW's gravatar image

BenGrantFTW
29336

I don't mind the current technology and we don't need new ones yet. We just need better games. New game hardwares are crap if they don't make good games. But for the Computer games, I want them to be compatible with a touch screen monitor since I like to play RTS games on it.

answered Jul 18 '10 at 20:37

vza004's gravatar image

vza004
1113

Maybe an online game where you play while your sleeping in your dreams. You would actually be in the game and it won't disturb your sleep. When you wake up you would have forgotten most of the things you did in the game because it was a dream game. So to sum it all up you would basically be playing using your mind.

This would probably never happen.

answered Sep 30 '10 at 12:05

Feras's gravatar image

Feras
5.5k90122179

In such situation, gamers will sleep all the time.

(Sep 30 '10 at 12:23) Viper92Z Viper92Z's gravatar image

Well then most kids will get to school on time.

(Sep 30 '10 at 12:35) Feras Feras's gravatar image

If you want cool, check out NeuroSky's as they are coming out with brain-reading video games...

answered Sep 30 '10 at 14:26

lseidman's gravatar image

lseidman
601

Star Trek Holodeck

alt text

answered Sep 30 '10 at 15:01

r0bErT4u's gravatar image

r0bErT4u ♦
30.6k497664929

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or __italic__
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Become a Gnomie!


Join Us in the Chat Room

Tags:

×683
×431
×401
×318
×90
×59
×59
×36
×20
×14
×13
×11
×7
×4
×1

Asked: Jul 03 '10 at 12:02

Seen: 1,147 times

Last updated: Sep 30 '10 at 15:01