|
Microsoft Windows XP is almost a decade old. Even though XP is supported until 2014, many new technology are already available that XP can not support. Because of this, as Microsoft claims, many of their new software won't simply work on Windows XP, including Internet Explorer 9 and Windows Live Essentials 2011. Even the next version of Microsoft's free Antivirus and Antimaliware software, Microsoft Security Essentials, will have a network feature unavailable to XP users. With that, also understand that over half of the world's PCs are loaded with Windows XP. So, deciding to not support a new software in that platform can take a major toll on the developer because over half the population cannot use it! At the same time, supporting windows XP might mean sacrificing some of the newer technology. And I am pretty sure that within years, more and more new technology will be released that Windows XP won't simply live up to. So what are your thoughts on this? How do you think the developers should go about doing this? I'd like to know what you think, so leave your responses below. |
|
As with all things computer, it all goes obsolete sooner or later. This will be true of XP. Its time to move on or get left behind. Thats just a Fact! Forget XP! |
|
With Windows 7 being such a great OS, I think it's time for everyone to move on the the latest & greatest. Now that we have something better than Vista to upgrade to. =) |
|
developers should offer windows xp versions of their code, or make certain features not work on xp if it isnt supported |
|
No, please. No. I can't believe that they are even considering this. |
|
Maybe people should realise that we aren't living in the stone age anymore? |
|
I believe in upgrading, and always being up to date with the latest software, including an operating system. So in my opinion, developers have a right to discontinue support for XP. When Windows XP came out, I was 5. Now I am 14, almost 15, and XP is still being sold. Software that is almost a decade old shouldn't be supported, especially when many things today can't work on XP. So, yes, they should. |
|
"Out with old in with the new!" xp had a grate run, I rember when XP came out in 2001, I could not wait to try it out. Now I will not touch it.
Anyone that does not know, if we did not have XP, we would not have what we have today. |
|
I think that they should not phase it out. For lower tech community's (Like mine) we still have XP. Even though that yes they should move on I am just saying that some people still use XP. Heck, I still have it on my server! |
|
Developers should avoid denying XP users unless absolutely necessary. It's best to keep things portable. In the majority of cases, an app you develop for Windows 7 will be able to compile & run perfectly fine on Windows XP. It wouldn't make sense to deny access to those users. If it is absolutely necessary, best practices are to establish a sensible modular approach such that the code that requires Windows 7 is separate from that which will run on XP. This way the code might be able to compile and the software might be able to use most of the features under Windows XP. |

HECK NO I like XP! I hate WIN 7!!! XP is the GoLDEN EGG!!! please noooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ready4war, If you love the old OS so much it seems logical that you'd enjoy the old software too. Just use oldversion.com to find treasures and it doesn't matter what modern software supports.