|
I recently bought Parallels at the recommendation of someone in a tech store (an employee). It runs really well, but I'm wondering If I made the right choice. So, what do you think; Parallels or VMware? |
|
I use VMWare Fusion on my Mac, but it isn't anything too exciting. Just another virtualization program. It does allow you to run Windows apps on your Mac without the whole Windows desktop (it just hides the desktop after booting up), so that's a plus. I don't have any virtual machines in it at the moment though, since I have a relatively tiny hard drive on my Mac mini. Personally, I'd recommend Wine. It's a compatibility layer that lets you run .exe files on your Mac natively. It does require a bit of terminal knowledge, and can be a bit tricky, and doesn't always support all the programs you'd want to use, but it gets the job done pretty well. If you wanna know how to get it installed on your Intel-based Mac, check out this article (and no, I don't get payed for you using that link). I actually like the ability to see the Windows desktop, so I wouldn't consider that a plus for VMware (I think the Windows desktop is better than that on Mac OS X 10.6, and Parallel's has the ability to run it without the desktop, already). It looks like Wine is free, but I already spent the money on Parallel's, and it doesn't seem as good (not being able to run certain programs, not having the desktop (my preference), having to know code etc.). I wouldn't switch to VMware if it makes you not have the desktop open. Is it a possibility to show the desktop? Use WineBottler removes the need to use code, and it can even compile a program for Mac that has all of Wine built in. |
|
You've already made an investment in Parallels, but there is also http://www.virtualbox.org/ as a free option. You could try it out to see if it has the speed/utility you need. |
|
Why someone would take a concept which incorporates cross platform mobility and reduce it's functionality is beyond me. Paralells is only for Mac. This is not a virtual machine option which should even be considered |
|
I know I was the one who asked this question, so I really shouldn't give an answer, but I e-mailed Chris asking him: "Hey Chris, I've noticed a few videos that you've previously done where you recommend buying VM Ware Fusion as opposed to Parallel's. I don't understand the benefits of each specific system, and I looked for a previous video comparing them, but the latest of those was in 2008. Could you please explain the pros and cons of each and why you like VMware better? From, Daniel Johnston" And he responded: **"http://go.tagjag.com/vmware - faster. :)"** Right now VMware has a deal where if you order the 3.1 version of their service as a previous Parallels or VMware Fusion user, you get it for only $9.99 as opposed to about $60, so I've ordered it and I'll be able to see firsthand which works better; at least for my needs. |
